The design of the friction stir welding tool controls the transverse rate at which FSW may be performed and is crucial to material flow. Three main purposes are performed by the tool: (a) heating the work piece; (b) moving material to create the joint; and (c) holding the hot metal under the tool shoulder. Friction between the rotating tool pin and shoulder as well as significant plastic deformation of the work cause heating within the work piece. The purpose of the tool shoulder is to contain the softened, plasticized metal underneath it and to apply heat to the surface of the material being welded by rotating the tool and applying a significant compressive force. One of the key elements of the friction stir welding process is comprehending the temperature generation surrounding the tool shoulder contact. The current study examined how different tool shoulder end features affected the 6082 aluminum alloy\\\'s mechanical characteristics and temperature. Convex tool shoulders provide the highest level of weld quality across all types when compared to other tool shoulders, according to the same criterion we used during the FSW joining procedure of AA6082.In the end, it was determined that the FSW of AA6082 would benefit greatly by tapper cylindrical, concave tool shoulders.
Introduction
Background & Context
Industries such as automotive, aerospace, and mechanical engineering often face challenges in component fabrication due to material incompatibilities and limitations of traditional welding methods. Solid-state joining methods—especially Friction Stir Welding (FSW)—offer solutions by avoiding melting, reducing defects (e.g., porosity and cracking), and enabling the joining of immiscible or difficult-to-weld alloys.
2. FSW Principles
Welding methods fall into:
Liquid-phase welding (e.g., arc, laser, electron beam)
FSW works by generating frictional heat and plastic deformation without melting the base material, leading to refined microstructures and mechanical properties often superior to fusion welding.
3. Applications of FSW
FSW is widely used in structural and non-structural applications, especially for aluminum alloys in:
Aerospace & automotive parts
Rocket engines & missile components
Reactor and turbine parts
Composite materials & structural assemblies
4. Research Objective
The study examines the effects of various FSW tool shoulder profiles (cylindrical, taper cylindrical, square, concave, and convex) on the weld quality of Aluminum 6082 alloy plates.
5. Experimental Setup
Material: Aluminum 6082 (a strong, heat-treatable alloy used in aerospace)
Machine: LML-KODI 40-VMC
FSW Parameters: Constant axial force (10 KN), rotation speed (1000 RPM), and feed rate (14 mm/min)
Tools: H-13 steel with different shoulder designs
6. Results and Observations
A. Mechanical Properties
Hardness: Cylindrical tool gave highest hardness (56 HRB), square gave lowest (42 HRB).
Tensile Strength: Highest in taper cylindrical (122 N/mm²), lowest in convex (83 N/mm²).
Root Bend Strength: Highest in concave (190.22 N/mm²), lowest in taper cylindrical (99.64 N/mm²).
B. Angle Distortion
Least distortion (1.04°) occurred in concave and convex shoulders.
Cylindrical and square tools showed higher distortion (~1.23°–1.25°).
C. Weld Appearance
Best weld texture was seen in cylindrical and concave profiles.
Taper cylindrical had cracks, square had pinholes, and convex showed mild porosity.
Conclusion
Several FSW tool shoulder profiles were compared and the FSW constant process parameter was assessed. In general, the weld quality has also been impacted by the tool shoulder profile. We have utilized square, convex, concave, wedge, and cylindrical tool shoulders for the FSW procedure.
1) According to this study, the concave tool shoulder profile tool executes without cracking and displays a nice weld bead following the FSW process.
2) During the process of welding with a square shoulder tool pin (42HRB), a low hardness value was attained.
3) In contrast to other tool shoulders, the cylindrical tool profile tool shoulder was accomplished with a very fine texture based on the weld appearance.
4) Compared to other tool shoulders, the taper cylindrical tool shoulder produced the highest tensile strength (122 N/mm2).
5) Compared to other shoulders, the concave tool shoulder produced the highest bending strength (190.22 N/mm2).
6) AUTOCAD analysis of the Angle Distortion Plate or Bead Straightness revealed that the maximum deviation was 2.5° in the tool shoulders at the square, taper cylindrical, and cylindrical shapes. The concave and convex tool shoulders showed the least amount of variation (1.04º).
7) Image J software is used to measure penetration depth. After all the plating was completed using different AA6082 tool shoulders, the Square tool shoulder was discovered to have the greatest penetration depth.
Among the several types of tool shoulders, the taper cylindrical tool shoulder exhibited the highest tensile strength, whereas the square tool shoulder exhibited the greatest depth of penetration. The lowest angle distortion were achieved concave & convex during the FSW process. The maximum root bend strength obtained at concave tool shoulders compared to other shoulders. It was determined that the FSW of AA6082 would benefit greatly by concave tool shoulders compared to other tool shoulders.
References
[1] KadaganchiRamanjaneyulu Role of Tool Shoulder Diameter in Friction Stir Welding: An Analysis of the Temperature and Plastic Deformation of AA 2014 Aluminium Alloy Article in Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals • October 2014
[2] Krishna Kishore Mugada Role of Tool Shoulder End Features on Friction Stir Weld Characteristics of 6082 Aluminum Alloy October 2017 / Accepted: 20 February 2018 The Institution of Engineers (India) 2018
[3] Noor Zaman Khan Effect of shoulder diameter to pin diameter (D/d) ratio on tensile strength of friction stir welded 6063 aluminium alloy 4th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization. Materials Today: Proceedings 2 ( 2015 ) 1450 – 1457
[4] J. Stephen Leon1 Effect of Tool Shoulder and Pin Cone Angles in Friction Stir Welding using Non-circular Tool Pin Received April 30 2019; Revised June 23 2019; Accepted for publication June 23 2019.
[5] Prakashkumarsahu Effect of shoulder diameter and plunging depth on mechanical properties and thermal history of friction stir welded magnesium alloy
[6] Muhsin J Jweeg Dissimilar Aluminium Alloys Welding by Friction Stir Processing and Reverse Rotation Friction Stir Processing. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 454 (2018) 012059
[7] M Krishna1Analysis on effect of using different tool pin profile and mechanical properties by friction stir welding on dissimilar aluminium alloys Al6061and Al7075 IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 402 (2018) 012099.
[8] S. D. Dhanesh Babu1Simulation of heat transfer and analysisof impact of tool pin geometry and toolspeed during friction stir welding ofAZ80A Mg alloy plates. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 34 (10) 2020
[9] R. K. KesharwaniaMulti Objective Optimization of Friction Stir Welding Parameters for Joining of Two Dissimilar Thin Aluminum Sheets, Science Direct, Procedia Materials Science 6 (2014) 178 – 187
[10] Rajesh Kumar Bhushan Optimization of FSW parameters for maximum UTS of AA6082/SiC/10Pcomposites Advanced Composites LettersVolume 28: 1–7.
[11] JitenderKundu, Hari Singh Friction stir welding of dissimilar Al alloys: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties Engineering Solid Mechanics (2016) 125-132.
[12] GurelÇam, VahidJavaheri& Akbar Heidarzadeh Advances in FSW and FSSW of dissimilar Al-alloy Plates journal of adhesion science and technology 2023, vol. 37, NO. 2, 162–194.
[13] GetachewGebreamlak, SivaprakasamPalani and BeleteSirahbizu Mechanical characteristics of dissimilar friction stir welding processes of aluminium alloy [AA 2024-T351 and AA 7075-T651] Manufacturing Rev. 11, 19 (2024) G. Gebreamlak et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2024.
[14] MeghnathSen, Sachindrashankar, SomnathChattopadhyaya Investigations into FSW joints of dissimilar aluminum alloys https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.218.
[15] Sadeesh Pa, VenkateshKannan M, Rajkumar V, Avinash P, Arivazhagan N, DevendranathRamkumar K, Narayanan S Studies on friction stir welding of AA 2024 and AA 6061 dissimilar Metals Procedia Engineering 75 ( 2014 ) 145 – 149.
[16] R. Raja, A. Parthiban, S. NandhaGopan and DereseDegefa Investigate the Process Parameter on the Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar Aluminium Alloys Volume 2022, Article ID 4980291, 8 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4980291.
[17] Essam B. Moustafa, MazenSharaf, Ghazi Alsoruji, Ahmed O. Mosleh S. S. Mohamed and Hossameldin Hussein Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of the Dissimilar AA7075 and AA2024 Aluminum Alloys Reinforced with Different Carbide ParticlesWelded by Friction Stir Welding 2023, 7, 448. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jcs7110448.
[18] D. Devaiah, K. Kishore, P.Laxminarayana Effect of Welding Speed on Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Friction Stir Welded AA5083-H321 and AA6061-T6 Aluminum Alloys [Vol-4, Issue-3, Mar- 2017] https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.4.3.4 ISSN: 2349-6495(P) | 2456-1908.
[19] P.JohnBritto, C.SaravanaMurthi and S.R.Kasthuri Raj Dissimilar friction stir welding between AA7075 and AA8011 aluminium alloy using CNC JOURNAL home page: http://www.aensiweb.com/JASR 2015 November; 11(22): pages 155-157.
[20] ShardaPratapShrivas, G.K. Agrawal, ShubhrataNagpal, Amit Kumar Vishvakarma, Ashish Kumar Khandelwal Dissimilar aluminum alloy joint strength is effected by heat addition in friction stir welding (FSW) Materials Today: Proceedings 44 (2021) 1472–1477.